Analytics Consent

We use analytics to understand better how people are using this site.

Permit Google Analytics?

Yes No
Skip to main content
Read page text
page 2
.,.,.. uartft-lJ--. Volume 10 No.1 (37) Spring 1963 Contents EDITORIAL . . . . . . . . . This Page YEHUDI MENUHIN They Served Humanity 3 H. LEWIS Requiem 4 KAREN GERSHON Two Poems ............... 5 ALEXANDER BARON On Being English and Jewish ........................ 6 GERDA CHARLES Trends in Anglo-Jewish Writ'ng 11 DANNIE ABSE Ezra Pound and My Father . . . 13 ARNOLD WESKER The Menace . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 15 FREDERICK RAPHAEL The Diary of Paul Feld- man .......................... . HARRY ZOHN The World of Arthur Schnitzler . . . 25 BEN DAVID Critical Curiostity . . . . . . 36 CHARLES S. SPENCER 23 Ten Years of AHgloJewish Art . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 31 DAVID DIRINGER Literacy in A n c i e n t Israel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 NORMAN BENTWICH Israel and the Dispersion 42 SIMON WOLF Arab- Israel Peace . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . 44 BOOKS AND WRITERS 46-56 ART REPRODUCTIONS: Frank Auerbach, Sandra Blow, Jacob Bornfriend, Harold Cohen, Lucien Freud. Henry Inlander, Stefan K n a p p, Ghisha Koenig, Leon Kossoff, Jacob Steinhardt. Editor: J. Sonntag Editorial: 68 Worcester Cresc., London, N.W.7 Tel. MIL 2268 Advertisement Representatives: Dower nouse Publicity Services 87-99 Aldgate High Street, Landon, E.C. 3, TPl. ROY 1~48 Single Copy 2s. 6d. (50 cents) Annual Subscription lOs. 6d. USA and Canada $2.50 (post free) EDITORIAL WHEN THE JEWISH QUARTERLY CAME INTO BEING TEN YEARS ago, it was at first looked upon by some with suspicion and. a good deal of scepticism as yet another attempt at establishing a cultural magazine in this country, while others welcome:i it, for this very reason, in the hope that this time it will not turn out to be yet another failure. One of the first to welcome it, after seeing the first issue, was the veteran of Anglo-Jewish journalism, Mr. Harry Sacher. Writing to the editor, he recalled his own association with the short-lived Jewish Review, w-hich he has co-edited with Norman Bentwich from 1910 to 1913. After that it became defunct, "for lack of writers and of readers". But, Mr. Sacher adde:i, "you seem to have the writers, I hope you will have the readers." And the late Leonard Montefiore, on entering his subscription, referred to his "veste:i interest" in the new publication, his father, Claude Montefiore, havin~ been the founder and editor of the scholarly Jewish Quarterly Review; this, too, has cease:i many years ago, though the title has been preserved by a similar publication in America. We single out these two testimonials from among a great number of others, which reached us, unsolicited, in those earlv difficult days, ten years ago. Coming as they did from people in many walks of life, they were often embarrassingly unanimous in their praise, all confirming that this new magazine really filled a gap-a need, if you like-and that its continuous existence was the concern of everyone interested in preserving our Jewish cultural heritage and in arousing a greater awareness of Jewish values, especially among the younger generation. Though new, and in some respects a new type of magazine, The Jewish Quarterly carried on an ol::ier tra:iition, rooted both in this country and in Central and Eastern Europe: to serve as a link between the past and the present-...:.between that which is valuable in our past and that which is new and forwad-looking in our present Against those who would deny any values in our past, considering it a chapter of a bygone age, filled with suffering and persecution, we maintaine:i, and still maintain, that we have a great deal to learn from it which could enrich our lives and shield us against losing our identities both as Jew;; and as human beings. On the other hand, against those who COVER: A plate from the facsimile edition of the famous Sarajevo Haggadah, published by W, H. Allen at £10.10.0
page 3
consider that our younger generation, our contemporary writers and artists, have nothing to give us except to make us realise our, and their own, shortcomings and failures, we contend that in the works of the best of them there is a serious effort to arrive at the truth-in terms of social and cultural values-whether or not the truth thus arrived might prove incompatible with accepted conventions. We prefer this search and probing to complacent conformity, which on the one hand leads to a false sense of security and, on the other, enforces a feeling of uncertainty in the face of real or imaginary dangers from within or without. Read the revealing and frank statement by Alexander Baron in this issue, and you will find in it a deep-seate:i Jewish consciousness and more Jewish awareness than in many a sermon and angry outcry from pulpit or platform, or in the columns of certain Jewish newspapers. Mr. Sacher appeared to have been right in saying, "you seem to have the writers"; though, frankly, we could not know at first who and where they were. Our association with some of them date:i back to an earlier venture immediately after the war, but they were not many. Now we are happy to note that most of the new writers who emerged in recent years became associated with this magazine as contributors, some writing more frequently than others, but all of them genuinely concerned with its future. They derived littl~ profit from writing in these columns-how could they when, to maintain this magazine was and still is, a continuous struggle?-yet they felt that thereby they were not only maintaining a link with the community but also contributing towards raising the standards. When the late Louis Golding wrote, with reference to The Jewish Quarterly, that "it is likely to warm up the future of AngloJewish letters which has seemed so chilly for some time", we could only hope that this would be so. Our new writers assure us of a brighter future, and we would like to think that we had contributed a little towards it. What about our readers? Judging from the many letters of appreciation we received and continue to receive, the magazine found a ready response. It would, however. be wrong to assume that we have reached the limit of potential readers of a magazine of this kind. The mechanics of distribution and circulation apply to this periodical as to any other, and in CONCLUDED AT TOP OF PACE 54 MESSAGES From William Frankel Editor, THE JEWISH CHRONICLE THE LIVES OF LITERARY PERIODICALS ARE generally harassed, hectic and short, and the fact that THE JEWISH QUARTERLY is now entering upon its eleventh year is in itself an achievement. But it has much more to commend it than the mere fact of survival. At a time of increasing materialism and narrowness it helps to perpetuate much of significance in the Jewish cultural scale of values. It reflects the literary and artistic trends throughout the Jewish world, and has in the past been a proving ground for new talent. It has tried to raise the level of intelligent discussion in the community and in English-speaking communities abroad. Although its existence is due to the single-mindedness and persistence of its Editor, the fact that it has received some general support is one of the saving graces of Anglo-Jewry today. From don Kimche Editor, JEWISH OBSERVER AND M.E. REVIEW ANNIVERSARY GREETINGS ARE NOT USUALLY noteworthy for either their frankness or the truthfulness, not even when they are transmitted from one editor to another. It would, therefore, be idle to deny that 1 have, during the decade of THE JEWISH QUARTERLY's existence, often voiced my concern at the single-minded concentration of your magazine on the blackest side of Jewish life. There were also other occasions when I felt that your contributors avoided the full confrontation between the Jewish writer and Jewish reality of today. But. these are matters of opiniov- and fade into unimportance when viewed against your major achievement during these ten years: you have succeeded in arousing AngloJewry out of its literary complacency and you have created a forum without which much of what is now considered as AngloJewish writing might never have developed. For that, you and THE JEWISH QuARTERLY must take the credit-or the blame. I, for one, am certain that Anglo-Jewry would have been very much the poorer culturally and intellectually without THE JEWISH QuARTERLY and I hope that from your modest beginning you may become the force in Jewish literary life which your magazine deserves to be.

Page Text

View plaintext

consider that our younger generation, our contemporary writers and artists, have nothing to give us except to make us realise our, and their own, shortcomings and failures, we contend that in the works of the best of them there is a serious effort to arrive at the truth-in terms of social and cultural values-whether or not the truth thus arrived might prove incompatible with accepted conventions. We prefer this search and probing to complacent conformity, which on the one hand leads to a false sense of security and, on the other, enforces a feeling of uncertainty in the face of real or imaginary dangers from within or without. Read the revealing and frank statement by Alexander Baron in this issue, and you will find in it a deep-seate:i Jewish consciousness and more Jewish awareness than in many a sermon and angry outcry from pulpit or platform, or in the columns of certain Jewish newspapers.

Mr. Sacher appeared to have been right in saying, "you seem to have the writers"; though, frankly, we could not know at first who and where they were. Our association with some of them date:i back to an earlier venture immediately after the war, but they were not many. Now we are happy to note that most of the new writers who emerged in recent years became associated with this magazine as contributors, some writing more frequently than others, but all of them genuinely concerned with its future. They derived littl~ profit from writing in these columns-how could they when, to maintain this magazine was and still is, a continuous struggle?-yet they felt that thereby they were not only maintaining a link with the community but also contributing towards raising the standards. When the late Louis Golding wrote, with reference to The Jewish Quarterly, that "it is likely to warm up the future of AngloJewish letters which has seemed so chilly for some time", we could only hope that this would be so. Our new writers assure us of a brighter future, and we would like to think that we had contributed a little towards it. What about our readers? Judging from the many letters of appreciation we received and continue to receive, the magazine found a ready response. It would, however. be wrong to assume that we have reached the limit of potential readers of a magazine of this kind. The mechanics of distribution and circulation apply to this periodical as to any other, and in

CONCLUDED AT TOP OF PACE 54

MESSAGES From William Frankel Editor, THE JEWISH CHRONICLE

THE LIVES OF LITERARY PERIODICALS ARE generally harassed, hectic and short, and the fact that THE JEWISH QUARTERLY is now entering upon its eleventh year is in itself an achievement. But it has much more to commend it than the mere fact of survival. At a time of increasing materialism and narrowness it helps to perpetuate much of significance in the Jewish cultural scale of values. It reflects the literary and artistic trends throughout the Jewish world, and has in the past been a proving ground for new talent. It has tried to raise the level of intelligent discussion in the community and in English-speaking communities abroad. Although its existence is due to the single-mindedness and persistence of its Editor, the fact that it has received some general support is one of the saving graces of Anglo-Jewry today.

From don Kimche Editor, JEWISH OBSERVER AND M.E. REVIEW

ANNIVERSARY GREETINGS ARE NOT USUALLY noteworthy for either their frankness or the truthfulness, not even when they are transmitted from one editor to another. It would, therefore, be idle to deny that 1 have, during the decade of THE JEWISH QUARTERLY's existence, often voiced my concern at the single-minded concentration of your magazine on the blackest side of Jewish life. There were also other occasions when I felt that your contributors avoided the full confrontation between the Jewish writer and Jewish reality of today. But. these are matters of opiniov- and fade into unimportance when viewed against your major achievement during these ten years: you have succeeded in arousing AngloJewry out of its literary complacency and you have created a forum without which much of what is now considered as AngloJewish writing might never have developed. For that, you and THE JEWISH QuARTERLY must take the credit-or the blame. I, for one, am certain that Anglo-Jewry would have been very much the poorer culturally and intellectually without THE JEWISH QuARTERLY and I hope that from your modest beginning you may become the force in Jewish literary life which your magazine deserves to be.

Read next page

My Bookmarks

Buy this Book
Skip to main content